Hannah Taurins Interview: Fashion Editorial Anima

Artist Take / 5 December 2025 / By: Sydney Sweeney

Hollywood Superstar visits Hannah Taurins studio in Brooklyn. Represented by Theta gallery, Taurins paintings are a step forward for contemporary figuration, which can sometimes fall into the gutter between ironic grotesque john currin derivations and tired imitations of Francis Bacon's phantasmagoria. Taurins captures the archival impulse - media is an ouroborus - with the pechance and kitschness of Audrey Hepburns Funny Face (1957).

Her mannequins, her muses, are drawn from the torn pages of now defunct fashion magazines, or scans from the FIT library. She preserves the flaws of the copier in her pastels and gouache. Inspiration ranges from carefully curated wedding boards on Pinterest, to the editorials of brands like Kiko Kostadinov.

Taurins work, for this editor, when paired with the accelerating relationship between fashion and art, encapsulates the habits of a certain level of online personhood. Mining for information, for images, nostalgic or futuristic, through digital and traditional archival integration.

Hannah Taurins reminds us most of Francis Picabia, "He's such a freak" Taurins says, "I love him".

Her exhibitions, including solo show God, Let me Be Your Instrument (Theta, 2025) and Cabin Pressure (2025) on view at Air Service Basel. are dramturgical, following the rise, hubris and desire of her female protagonists.

Hollywood Superstar

How do you source images? What do you look for? There is a trend at the moment for artists working in both traditional and non-traditional mediums to search for slightly retro, editorial images on Pinterest. It's a new kind of source material. That and the mannequin trend, but I guess models are just mannequins, in a way.

Hannah Taurins

I’m not above Pinterest - it’s crazy - like for the next show I'm working on a bridal theme, and obviously, Pinterest is perfectly engineered for bridal planning.

You can often tell when the original poster is just a really passionate researcher with a scanner. I like to use libraries at FIT. Thefashionspot.com is a big one too. I follow a bunch of fashion magazine scan accounts on instagram. I used to use Flickr when I was using freakier, niche photos and was more paranoid about copyright. Deviant Art, too.

It’s tough because not every good photo is going to make a good drawing. That’s why I felt challenged by the Kiko Kostadinov images. They were such compelling photos, but hard to translate into compelling images.

With some works I have to take on more responsibility for the “why” of the drawing.

I used to not draw men at all, I just didn’t feel interested in it. This has changed for me recently. Lately I’ve been drawing men in a fantasy lover role! This has been lots of fun for me, and I think is a result of some recent healing. Plus I love men. Maybe before I felt as if to make a successful work I had to embody the subject, and I felt far away from men. But now I just love to put them in as a little vessel for desire.

When you work, you’re drawing from a photocopy of the original photograph, so you're twice removed from the actual photographic scene. Your backgrounds, too, have a semi-abstraction in them, like you’ve captured the detritus on the surface of the photograph, or the glare on the camera lens.

My images are distorted from the magazine. I like the idea of incorporating a glare or translating the glitch that comes with the photocopy. It’s exciting to me that you noticed that. Sometimes the decisions I make with color are a result of my printer running low on ink or something. But even to include a margin or to draw the stack of pages underneath the page with my reference.

Do you feel like there's a trend in figurative painting, or drawing, toward using super niche internet language?

I've felt this way since Tumblr. The source material feels like a natural part of my practice. I had a fashion makeup blog - which I deleted when I was in cringe mode. I pick the images in a way that I can say something about myself. For my last show at Theta, God, Let me be Your Instrument, it was about this groupie. She is following this musician around that she's enamoured by, and she reaches stardom, but then she falls, and she dies. It’s super personal, that story.

I remember in high school making paintings of screenshots from snapchat messages. My teachers hated it! They had no idea why I was doing it. I was fascinated by how my friends and I were communicating with each other.

There is a painting of her called Groupies Live Forever, 2025 where her soul is coming out of her body - she finds herself spiritually reborn. How did the concept for this piece arise?

When I first thought of it, I knew the show would be about rock stars. All the images I had been compiling were fashion images referencing music. I thought the protagonist of the paintings could be a groupie. I did get my heart broken by a musician while making this show. I remember doing a walkthrough at the gallery with a drawing class from Princeton. I turned totally red when I told them the show was about my breakup. It was so vulnerable but that’s how I knew it was right for me to share. What better catalyst for personal transformation than love and heartbreak? This painting is about that. In life if you do it consciously I think one dies and is reborn many times.

So what about the next show, the bride? That’s a kind of another nostalgic kick, bridal couture is such a specific niche but a huge industry, every Pinterest user can recount being accosted with a million bridal mood pages.

I want to do a delusional bride. I’m building the storyline now - what is her character arc? I’m the age my mom was when she got married and had me. I’m curious about the fantasy of the perfect bride and holy union, and the anxieties surrounding that. I feel caught now more than ever between being a sort of perfectly self contained artist for the rest of my life, taking lovers, whatever, and really buying the marriage story.

There’s something there too about Jung’s Animus - the unconscious masculine in a woman. The first work I made with this show in mind was of a pregnant woman. It’s my fantasy about self-fertilization, the result of integrating all parts of oneself and achieving this kind of creative fertility.

How do you feel like your practice and Instagram interact with each other? This idea of looking, being looked at. Your work have these female protagonists that appeal to a gaze - but also to a digital lens. Like, your paintings do well on Instagram. When your refiguring these photocopied images, or painting a steven meisel campaign, do you feel the gaze changes at all?

I used to feel shameful about this, but I no longer do. Making work that does well on Instagram is important to me - fuck it. People have fantasies about what artists are like - my work is about meeting people halfway, creating things. That’s where desire comes in. I think viewers desire something naughty, an insight into me as a person, or into the artwork.

I am often looking for an energy - one for myself and one that I want to bring to the work, as well. It feels so earnest, it's my own creative and sexual desire, and if that's a traditional male gaze…then.

I think you can tell my work is made by a woman. I went to Cooper Union when it wasn’t super fashionable to be making sexy figurative work. It was conceptual work that went down easier there. I’ve gotten a few bad reviews - this vlogger went into my show and talked about this one work, Spread. He comes into the gallery and starts talking about the work, but doesn’t want to be told about it, he’s monologing like:

“I’ve just been seeing images of this painting all over Instagram, and had to come see it myself, it must be a fluke, it collapses modernism and postmodernism into one painting, and theres no way that Hannah Taurins could have been aware she was making such a brilliant move”.

Something about Barnett Newman, lines, abstraction and Courbet’s origin of the world. He just couldn’t give me the compliment. He couldn’t acknowledge the sensuality of the show for one second; he even described the painting as prudish.

Hannah Taurins work installed at Salon (October 16th-19th, 2025) by Hollywood Superstar, Chess Club and Gnossienne Gallery.

Talk to me about your process of making. Do you ever paint from live models? Or only printed images?

I much prefer working from printed images because I can be kind of weird and intense in the studio. I like to get very stoned and listen to the same songs over and over again. I feel moved to draw at odd hours and can’t predict when I need to step away for a walk or a nap or whatever.

When I'm making work, this shift happens. I'll be looking at something and being so present in my body. I find that the hardest thing about my process is to let myself be that present, and when there's someone else in the studio, it's so much harder. I have to completely objectify them. There's a shift between looking at someone as a person in your studio, and breaking them down into shapes and lines.

And that switch doesn't happen when you paint from images?

It’s almost automatic but once it happens, it feels like there is no separation from myself and the image. I am just a vessel for the work. I’m addicted to that space, and have been since I was a kid.